Wearables are now part of many athletes’ daily routine. Watches, rings, straps, and even sensor-enhanced clothing promise real-time insights into your training, performance, and recovery. But how accurate are they? And more importantly—does accuracy matter if you’re using wearable tech to guide your training?
Studies show that while some numbers are useful, others still have a long way to go. Here’s what the research says, and how athletes should use the data.

How Accurate Are Wearables?
Energy Expenditure
Wearables are still not reliable when it comes to estimating how many calories you burn. Accuracy depends on the type of sensor, where it’s worn, and the algorithms behind the data, and devices often underestimate energy use in high-intensity or stop-start sports like soccer, CrossFit, or interval training. As of 2020, none of the major consumer brands—including Fitbit, Apple Watch, or Garmin—could measure energy expenditure accurately. Many underestimated calorie burn, while others, like Apple and Polar, often overestimated.
Don’t rely on calorie-burn data to guide your fueling or recovery strategies.
Steps and Movement Tracking
Step counts from wearables are generally reliable—especially in steady conditions like treadmill walking or running on flat ground. Accuracy is less consistent in real-world conditions like trail running, uneven surfaces, or sports with quick changes of direction. Wearables also struggle when arm movement doesn’t match steps (like pushing a stroller or carrying gear).
Step counts are good for tracking overall activity levels—just don’t expect precision in every type of situation.
Heart Rate
Heart rate is one of the most useful wearable metrics and most devices are fairly accurate at rest or during steady-state exercise. But, during high-intensity or interval workouts, optical sensors can lag or underestimate—Fitbit in particular, has shown this. While heart rate-based training zones may not always be spot-on, wearables are fairly reliable for heart rhythm monitoring and can even detect some arrhythmias.
Use heart rate trends, but pair them with perceived effort—or a chest strap if you want real accuracy.
Sleep Tracking
Wearables can provide a useful view of sleep patterns, but the details aren’t exact. Devices often overestimate total sleep time and misclassify sleep stages. Of the most popular consumer devices, WHOOP tends to be most accurate for total sleep time and sleep stages like light and deep sleep, while Fitbit has performed better for REM.
Sleep data is helpful for spotting trends, but don’t stress over whether you got exactly 90 minutes of deep sleep—those numbers aren’t exact.
Training Load and Biomechanics
Some wearables estimate training load using heart rate, movement, and oxygen uptake; others track biomechanics like stride length, jump height, or joint angles. These can show workload trends, but accuracy varies by sport, surface, and sensor placement. VO₂max and intensity are often overestimated, and small errors in biomechanical data can be misleading, especially if athletes try to make form changes based on it.
Training load and biomechanics data are useful for spotting trends, but are not yet reliable enough to replace traditional coaching feedback or lab tools.
Injury Prevention Potential
Perhaps the most exciting, but least proven, application. By combining multiple sensors, some devices can flag asymmetries, fatigue markers, or movement patterns linked to overuse. Early research is promising, but consistency is a major challenge—signals are noisy, models drift over time, and what’s “normal” varies from athlete to athlete.
Treat injury-prevention wearables as experimental tools—helpful for context, but never a substitute for listening to your body or coach.
Why Accuracy Matters for Athletes
For athletes, data is only as valuable as the decisions it drives. Accuracy matters because:
-
If your heart rate is underestimated, you may think you’re not working hard enough.
-
If calories are overestimated, you might eat more than you need; if underestimated, you risk underfueling.
-
If sleep stages are flagged incorrectly, you might stress about recovery when you’re actually fine.
The danger is letting numbers override your own experience. Misleading data can create false confidence—or unnecessary worry.
That said, wearables are still valuable tools. Resting heart rate and step counts are reliable for tracking baseline health and activity. Sleep data helps spot patterns over time. Biomechanics or load estimates can highlight broad trends—even if they aren’t exact.
The key is using wearables as tools to inform—not dictate—your training. Pair what the numbers show with how you feel, feedback from your coach, and tried-and-true markers like performance tests or race results. That’s when wearable tech becomes an advantage, not a distraction.
Key Takeaways
-
Step counts are generally reliable for overall activity, but not perfect in every scenario.
-
Heart rate is useful for trends but less reliable at high intensity—chest straps are more accurate.
-
Energy expenditure is the least reliable metric—don’t base your fueling strategy on this.
-
Sleep tracking is good for spotting patterns, not exact stage data.
-
Training load and biomechanics show trends but aren’t precise enough for fine adjustments.
-
Injury-prevention features are promising but still experimental.
In the end, wearables don’t need to be perfect to be useful. They can help you track habits, stay consistent, and identify trends—but they’re not coaches or medical tools. Use them as one input among many, and always anchor training and recovery decisions in your own performance and how your body feels.
If you learned something new and are curious to know more, head over to the Blonyx Blog or our growing list of weekly research summaries where we help you further improve your athletic performance by keeping you up to date on the latest findings from the world of sports science.
– Train hard!
Looking for more ways to keep up with Blonyx?
Now, you can join the Blonyx Strava Club to track your progress, share training tips, and connect with athletes who share your athletic ambition.
You can also follow us on Instagram and Facebook for additional sports science information, announcements, exciting giveaways, and more!